Review The Hartnell Doctor

Dr Who - The William Hartnell Era in Colour

As recommended in Doctor Who Magazine: Issue 522 I've created this colourised trailer to pay tribute to "the original, you might say" in celebration of William Hartnell and the first era of Dr Who.

Click to expand...

Doctor Who: Debut episode script sells for £6,200


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-43977247

Get your coat and go home, David Bradley.....

This is how you play the first Doctor.......

Yes, he may have had flaws as a human being....

And fluffed his lines....

And had some of the visuals in his era wiped out forever.....

But when he was handed a good script.......

William Hartnell

“Space travel? Quite honestly, it scares me to death. I haven’t the slightest wish to get in a rocket and zoom through the stratosphere. Somebody else can be the first man on the moon. It doesn’t interest me at all. I do, however, believe that there is life on other planets – and that they know we’re here but haven’t got the technology to get through.

“We did ‘Doctor Who’ for forty-eight weeks a year but I loved it. I couldn’t go out into the street without a bunch of children following me, like the Pied Piper. People used to take it terribly seriously. I’d get letters from boys swotting for exams, asking me complicated questions about time ratios and the TARDIS. I couldn’t help them. A lot of the script writers used to make the Doctor use expressions like ‘centrifugal force’ but I refused. If it gets too technical, the children don’t understand and they lose interest. I saw the Doctor as a kind of lama, one of those long-lived old boys out in Tibet who might be anything up to eight hundred years old but only look seventy-five.”

William Hartnell

This rare William Hartnell interview from 1964 was conducted between seasons 1 and 2, in terms of production at least.

Q: Are you pleased with the way the series has been received?

A: Very. We’re all very pleased and honoured that so many people seem to have taken it to their hearts.

Q: Are you surprised at how popular ‘Doctor Who’ is?

A: In some ways yes, in some ways no. I always believed in the idea of it, but a good idea is no guarantee of success. I suppose it was with the second serial, where we meet the Daleks, that it really took off. I’m very pleased. They’re coming back, you know, in the new series.

Q: Are the Daleks your favourite monsters from the first series?

A: Well I’m not sure that they weren’t the only monsters. All the other adversaries, were they really monsters? They were in many cases human, or human-like, and quite complicated in terms of their motivations. I think perhaps the Daleks were the only monsters. They were very good. I knew that from the moment I first saw them, I knew they had legs, if you’ll excuse the pun.

Q: Are there any other adversaries from the first series returning?

A: No, I don’t think so. We don’t want to rest on our laurels, we want to create new adversaries. The Daleks we can’t ignore, they’re everywhere, they’ve invaded the high street. But I hope we don’t overuse them. I was very clear on that with the producers. I told them we must not let the series descend into constant Dalek battles. They must be used sparingly.

Q: Do you have much input when it comes to storylines?

A: No, I keep my nose out. I dare say I could have more of a say, but we have very talented writers and I let them get on with their job, as I get on with mine.

Q: How much of the character of Doctor Who was present in the original script, and how much did you add?

A: Most of it was there. I brought something of myself to it, I’m sure, but if he and I sat down together we would seem very different. I think he’s a wonderful character, very mysterious and enigmatic but very kind beneath the veneer of grumpiness.

Q: You’re filming a second series now. Will there be a third?

A: I hope so. I think so. One never knows, but I think we’ll be back. I shall certainly be back if they let me.

William Hartnell

There are relatively few William Hartnell interviews concerning his time on ‘Doctor Who’, and most of them are puff pieces intended for promotion. This interview is based on various comments pulled together, and as such is less of an interview and more of an overview of his comments on the programme.

“I was so pleased to be offered Doctor Who. To me kids are the greatest audience – and the greatest critics – in the world.

“It may seem like hindsight now, but I just knew that Doctor Who was going to be an enormous success. Don’t ask me how. Not everybody thought as I did. I was universally scoffed at for my initial faith in the series, but I believed in it. It was magical.

“Before the part came along I’d been playing a bunch of crooks, sergeants, prison warders and detectives. Then, after appearing in This Sporting Life, I got a phone call from my agent. He said, “I wouldn’t normally have suggested you work in children’s television, Bill, but there’s a sort of character part come up that I think you’d just love to play.

“My agent said the part was that of an eccentric old grandfather- cum-professor type who travels in space and time. Well, I wasn’t that keen, but I agreed to meet the producer.

“Then, the moment this brilliant young producer Miss Verity Lambert started telling me about Doctor Who, I was hooked. I remember telling her, “This is going to run for five years.” And look what’s happened.

“We did it forty-eight weeks a year in those days and it was very hard work. But I loves every minute.

“You know, I couldn’t go out into the high street without a bunch of kids follwing me. I felt like the Pied Piper.

“People really used to take it literally. I’d get letters from boys swotting for O-levels asking complicated questions about time-ratio and the TARDIS. The Doctor might have been able to answer them – I’m afraid I couldn’t! But I do believe there is life on other planets – and they know there’s life here but don’t have the technology to get through.

“Doctor Who is certainly a test for any actor. Animals and children are renowned scene-stealers and we had both – plus an assortment of monsters that became popular in their own right. Look at the Daleks. They started in the second series and were an immediate success.

“At one time (in late 1964) I thought we might extend the series and I suggested giving the Doctor a son and calling the programme The Son of Doctor Who. The idea was for me to have a wicked son. We would both look alike, each have a TARDIS and travel in outer space. In actual fact, it would have meant that I had to play a dual role when I `met’ my son.

“But the idea was not taken up by the BBC so I dropped it. I still think it would have worked and been exciting to children.

“Memories? There are so many. There was the occasion when I arrived at an air display in the TARDIS and the kids were convinced I had flown it there! On another occasion I went by limousine to open a local fete. When we got there the children just converged on the car cheering and shouting, their faces all lit up. I knew then just how much the Doctor really meant to them.”

I had two of those Daleks that Bill had on his cabinet! I lost the eyes as all kids do and the second one had a cracked head! I remember painting one of them black so that I would have a leader Dalek after watching the two Peter Cushing films in 72! Great times!
JB

Good art but not keen on the NuWho Silurians one bit! Much prefer Warriors of The Deep triad!
JB

I hate the design they settled on for the new series Silurians.

All thanks to Moffat rejecting this earlier design.....

I also dislike the way they are now mixing and matching old and new elements on BIG FINISH. Feels like... contamination - even extending to the above art, which I admit is nicely done.

From being pleased that the new series was a direct continuation, I now wish the whole thing had touted itself as a complete reboot in 2005 and that Eccleston had been Doctor number One. The new show is such a different beast that they should have perhaps honestly severed it from the start.

Ironically, Mark Gattis said in an interview before it came back that, if he were given the show he would do it as a complete reboot.

Those Silurians looked very good and I was shocked when I first found out they'd been rejected! Especially when you see what we got instead!!! Moffhack, how I loathe that guy!
JB

Doctor Omega said:

I also dislike the way they are now mixing and matching old and new elements on BIG FINISH. Feels like... contamination - even extending to the above art, which I admit is nicely done.

From being pleased that the new series was a direct continuation, I now wish the whole thing had touted itself as a complete reboot in 2005 and that Eccleston had been Doctor number One. The new show is such a different beast that they should have perhaps honestly severed it from the start.

Ironically, Mark Gattis said in an interview before it came back that, if he were given the show he would do it as a complete reboot.

Click to expand...

How could you do a complete reboot with imitating the vast collection of stories from the show's forty year history at that time? Eccleston as the First Doctor obviously without the white hair and Victorian clothes wouldn't work from the point of the long term fans! And if you did decide to copy key points it would take years just to reveal the Doctor's true identity as a Time Lord surely?
JB

All good points, JB, but I guess it all boils down to me having become so disillusioned with Modern Era Who that I just want to amputate the gangrenous mess that I feel it has become. And 2005 seemed a logical chop it off point.

A second chop off point would be the end of Capaldi, for the Doctor has lived thirteen lives by that point, if one counts the War Doctor and doesn't count Handy as regenerations.

Either way, I have fallen out of love with this modern iteration of the show. Not that there was a huge romance to start with....

Thank Heavens for Classic dvd's.

I agree totally, Doc! Thank heavens for the Classic years DVDs! When Who was Who and any changes made to the show were really for the best!
JB